News, What's Trending

Mayowa Ahmed and cohorts may face 419 scam charges, 7 year jail term

img_1893

The Mayowa Ahmed Shukurat’s twist, if established as a premeditated fraud, may affect the cancer patient herself, her family members, doctors and nurses in Lagos State University Teaching Hospital (Idi Araba, Surulere) and star actress Toyin Aimakhu as well as all those who participated in encouraging Nigerians to donate N38 million towards her purported treatment in Georgia, United States of America.The Criminal Code Act, Part 6, Chapter 38 which deals with obtaining property by false pretenses and cheating is clear.

And for more clarity, here is the popular section 419 :

 

419. Any person who by any false pretence, and with intent to defraud, obtains from any other person anything capable of being stolen, or induces any other person to deliver to any person anything capable of being stolen, is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for three years.

 

If the thing is of the value of one thousand naira or upwards, he is liable to imprisonment for seven years.

 

It is immaterial that the thing is obtained or its delivery is induced through the medium of a contract induced by the false pretence.

 

The offender cannot be arrested without warrant unless found committing the offence.

419A. (1) Any person who by any false pretence or by means of any other fraud obtains credit for himself or any other person-

 

(a) in incurring any debt or liability; or

 

(b) by means of an entry in a debtor and creditor account between the person giving and the person receiving credit,is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for three years.

 

(2) The offender cannot be arrested without warrant unless found committing the offence.

 

419B. Where in any proceedings for an -offence under section 419 or 419A it is proved that the accused-

 

(a) obtained or induced the delivery of anything capable of being stolen; or

 

(b) obtained credit for himself or any other person, by means of a cheque that, when presented for payment within a reasonable time, was dishonoured on the ground that no funds or insufficient funds were standing to the credit of the drawer of the cheque in the bank on which the cheque was drawn, the thing or its delivery shall be deemed to have been obtained or induced, or the credit shall he deemed to have been obtained, by a false pretence unless the court is satisfied by evidence that when the accused issued the cheque he had reasonable grounds for believing, and did in fact believe, that it would be honoured if presented for payment within a reasonable time after its issue by him.

Related Stories:

Comments

comments

About the Author